In this bull run, the most frustrating thing is not being trapped 20% in my position, but rather holding onto a top-tier project for four years. This project does not rely on selling coins to maintain operations, demonstrating its strong fundamentals. However, it is perplexing that despite the project party's profits soaring from 200,000 USDT in 2021 to 14 million USDT today, they have taken a hands-off approach to the tokens they issued and have never invested funds to support the coin price.

If the project party is willing to intervene in the market moderately, I might have already gained substantial returns. Unfortunately, their approach has left investors feeling very disappointed. Right now, it seems this round of market trends is about to slip away from us again.

This situation raises a deeper question: even high-quality projects, if they completely ignore the secondary market, may become a torment for investors. It reminds us that when choosing projects for long-term holding, we should not only pay attention to the quality of the project itself but also assess the project party's emphasis on Token economics.

At the same time, this also highlights the complexity of the cryptocurrency market. Even if a project performs excellently in terms of operation and profitability, failing to strike a balance between the value of the Token and the interests of investors can also trap holders in a long-term predicament.

For investors, this case may inspire us to rethink our investment strategies. While maintaining a long-term positive outlook, we should also pay timely attention to the project party's market strategies and how they balance project development with Token value.